Renovation of No.16, No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong, Beijing, China by URBANUS

New public space represents a better neighborhood

项目标签

设计公司
URBANUS
位置
China
类型
Architecture
材料
StoneBrick
标签
BeijingRenovation
分类
Public Space

来自都市实践 对gooood的分享。更多关于他们: URBANUS on gooood
Appreciation towards URBANUS for providing the following description:

规制化的院子布置完后,利用剩余的边角空间因地制宜形成的,它们构成了另一种更有活力的院落景象,体现在由于不统一的杂多布局而产生的自然美。当然这种活力也会在日常生活中走向另一种极端,那就是当每户人家都在这种杂多的布局中努力去占有更多的私人空间时,则活力反而会被混乱窒息。

In Beijing’s Hutong area, there are many courtyards formed by left-over spaces between regular Siheyuan courtyard systems. These common but dynamic courtyards represent a kind of informal aesthetics. However, this liveliness sometimes ends in chaos when residents trying to extremely occupy public space for private use.

▼改造后的雨儿胡同,Yu’er Hutong after renovation ©申立仁、王雨蒙

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

雨儿胡同16、18、20号就是这样的边角杂院,它是由三个院子构成的,院子的感觉并不强,仿佛是一条胡同里的胡同。在没在进行环境整治前,这条胡同里的胡同实际上是个迷宫,因为每户的私搭乱建使得公共空间变成一条极小宽度的蜿蜒的线型走道。从外人眼里看,这种曲折似乎充满了自下而上的活力,而事实上任何一个曲折都是邻居间空间博弈的结果。

The NO. 16, 18 and 20 courtyards in Yu’er Hutong belong to this kind of “left-over” type, and form a space of a Hutong within a Hutong. Before renovation, this “Hutong within a Hutong” is a linear narrow passage, like a maze shaped by alongside expanding private spaces. Every bottom-up space making, no matter how lively and lovely the visual effects are, is actually a result of spatial gaming between neighbors.

▼雨儿胡同区位,site location ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼雨儿胡同院落肌理演变,texture analysis ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼改造前的院落,courtyard before renovation ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS 1

因此解决公共空间的问题,也部分地变成解决邻里社会矛盾的问题。尤其是在这样边角的居住空间,居民本来就是社会的低收入阶层,这里的百分之八十以上是不可能支付起其它地方高额房租的原住民,又面临着老龄化日益给他们生活投下的黯淡阴影。他们也希望院子中生活的和谐和阳光。

To solve the problem of public space is to solve the conflict between neighbors. Those low-income and aging local tenements living in the left-over courtyards cannot afford to rent another apartment elsewhere. They aspire for harmonious and sunny life in the courtyard.

▼改造后的院落,courtyard after renovation ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

在通过有限补偿的方式拆除了部分私搭乱建后,公共空间的改造有可能呈现出一种新的邻里空间景象。

After removing some illegal construction by limited compensation, the new public space would represent a better neighborhood.

▼整体改造轴测图,overall axonometric ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

第一,将院子中原本杂多的元素用统一的建筑语言进行表达,使其由散乱状态转变为聚焦状态,从而使公共空间产生凝聚力。

Firstly, systematically simplifying various elements to make the courtyard more unified.

▼院落局部轴测,partial axonometric ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼台明与矮墙,platform and low walls ©胡海波

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼台明,platform ©申立仁、王雨蒙

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

第二,通过用四棵树(其中两棵为新种植)把原来无主题的空间进行叙事化的统一,把原先妨碍交通、要绕道而过的老树,变成小院故事的记忆点,有一种历史时间的凝聚力。

Secondly, transforming the spaces around trees as gathering places.

▼院落局部轴测,partial axonometric ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼院落剖透视,perspective section ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼院内的树木成为历史的记忆点,trees recalling the memory of the courtyard ©申立仁、王雨蒙

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼利用旧有的防盗窗装点的车棚,bicycle shed decorated by recycled security window ©申立仁、王雨蒙

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

第三,通过平衡公共领域和私人领域利益的对立统一,尽量激励每户自发地美化门前的半私人空间,使居民的参与变成邻里关系的凝聚力。

Thirdly, balancing the benefit between public realm and private space. These design strategies encourage residents to maintain their own front door environment well, and to participate in public commonwealth actively.

▼改造后院落里的邻里生活,life in the courtyard afterrenovation ©申立仁、王雨蒙

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼邻里间的日常交流,communication in the neighborhood ©申立仁、王雨蒙

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

另一个关于社会学的设计策略在重建、补建的新房中,我们有意做了适合年轻单身的小户型,希冀招租能对院落空间的日常维护和改善有担当的年轻人,来稀释这里的老龄人口密度,带来新生活的活力。

Another social experiment is to provide small units for young professionals in the new houses, so as to introduce young people’s lifestyles to vitalize this aging community.

▼新建建筑中满足年轻人居住的生活空间,space for young people in the new buildings ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼室内剖透视,perspective section ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

这个院子的设计,是通过对普通的一砖一瓦的精心铺砌,呈现出对日常生活的礼赞。工法上,砖的组合方式所显示出的手工匠意,给空间带来精神上的温度。色彩上,用红砖加杂进灰砖,也表白了这个杂院的身份,给空间带来生活的温度。布品上,旧的石门蹲、私家花盆、老物件、晒衣杆等被揉合到新的系统中,呈现出包容性做为大杂院视觉活力,给空间带来了日常的温度。建构上,植入框架式的构筑物,和邻居家的后墙对话,并形成胡同里的核心空间,给空间带来邻里的温度。

The design philosophy is to celebrate the everyday life by careful craftsmanship with simple daily materials. In techniques, the masonry work represents the hand making and brings spiritual warmness to the space. In color, the combination of red bricks and grey ones represents the characteristics of the courtyard and brings living warmness to the space. In details, the tectonic solution to combine the old with the new brings design warmness to the space.

▼旧的石门蹲和拆下来的窗户,restored stone foundation and recycled window frame ©胡海波

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼雨水管和雨链,downspout and rain chain ©胡海波

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

大杂院中公共空间的再规划,为原住民带来了生活和身份的尊严。这种设计的基石是设计师对日常生活中矛盾的观察,对日常生活中习惯的尊重,和对日常生活中模式的升华。这个胡同中胡同的最终设计成果,也是项目设计师零距离、不间断地与原住民交流的结果。无论如何评价这样的成果,它表达了当代设计师对大杂院这种空间形态的善意愿景。

The public space design in these “left-over” courtyards is to restore the dignity and decency of the residents. It is based on our careful observation of their everyday life, with the respect of their lifestyles. The final achievement of redesigning this “Hutong within Hutong” is also resulted from continuously face to face communication between architects and local residents. It is our good will to have a visionary solution for keeping the vitality of everyday in this sort of courtyards.

▼院落路口,paths in the courtyard ©申立仁、王雨蒙

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS 1

▼改造后院内儿童的玩乐,children playing in the renovated courtyard ©申立仁、王雨蒙

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼模型照片,model ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

▼平面图,plan ©都市实践

Renovation of No.16 No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong URBANUS

项目名称:雨儿胡同16、18、20号院综合整治改造提升
项目地点:北京市东城区南锣鼓巷雨儿胡同16、18、20号院
设计时间:2019
建设时间:2019
用地面积:1,000㎡
建设单位:京诚集团
设计单位:URBANUS都市实践
事务所网站:www.urbanus.com.cn
主持建筑师: 王辉
设计团队完整名单:王辉、姚咏梅、胡海波、张富军、李永才、梁雪成、王玮 | 胡家铭(实习)
摄影:胡海波、申立仁、王雨蒙 

Project: Renovation of No.16, No.18 and No.20 Quads in Yu’er Hutong
Project Location: Dongcheng District, Beijing
Design Period: 2019
Construction Period: 2019
Site Area: 1,000㎡
Client: Jincheng Group
Architecture Design: URBANUS Architecture & Design Inc.
Website: www.urbanus.com.cn
Principal Architect: Wang Hui
Design Team: Yao Yongmei, Hu Haibo, Zhang Fujun, Li Yongcai, Liang Xuecheng, Wang Wei |  Hu Jiaming (Intern)
Photographers: Hu Haibo, Shen Liren, Wang Yumeng

More: 都市实践。更多关于他们: URBANUS on gooood

点击联系该项目/文章的创作/分享者

Latest jobs+ Post a jobAll jobs »

发表评论

13 评论

  1. 用户名936275

    个人认为做这种小巷子的改造还是需要做一些回访

  2. 用户名915627

    在北京读书之余会时常到胡同走走,感受那种古朴的气质,虽说难以避免地在项目中看到了景观的元素与造景手法的是用,但这个设计改造整体看上去还是比较有胡同味儿的,楼下的评论有谈设计对于生活需求的回应,也有讨论到建筑原始住所被剥夺这一问题,个人对这两个问题作逐一的理解与思考:1、忽视了居民日常的实用功能对空间的需求,或许是设计师在设计阶段过于注重整体空间的造景,其实只需腾出一个、两个或多个空间用于解决这些基础功能诉求(设计规划这些空间本身也可以使用文章所说的一些废旧材料)、减少一部分造景空间就能达到这个目标。2、感觉原始住所灵魂被剥夺,剩下一堆建筑垃圾,莫名没了生活气息,如果你是以一名外人的身份持这一观点,那我更不敢苟同,首先可以去询问当地居民对这种设计改造情景的看法,以及他们理想中的改造方式,其次,从造景使用的材料以及改造完成后的意象来看,建筑平立面的材质使用都没有完全脱离传统北京胡同的风韵与特色,白墙、红墙、灰墙黑瓦依旧留存,四合院和老北京建筑的灵魂就在于它的建筑结构、街道铺装材料及周围景观,以个人之见看此项目,这些因素并没有被完全剥夺。更何况记忆是一个长期积淀的过程,只要环境没有破坏,记忆便会以一种崭新的方式继续留存延续。

  3. 用户名618290

  4. 染净识

    希望以后不会乱堆杂物

  5. Viny

    作为一个从小住在胡同里的老北京说两句。我觉得院子设计的过于景观化了,忽视了居民日常的实用功能对空间的需求。这样的院子半年以后再进去又会是大杂院的样子。这么多户居民,日常的自行车停车,衣物晾晒,等生活需求完全没有回应,单纯的景观塑造而忽略大杂院日常实用功能恐怕还不适合北京老城区。
    当然还是要感谢设计师对于北京四合院改造做出的努力,希望以后有更多这样的项目对中国传统民居进行各方向的探索。

    1. 用户名045683

      我看人家有做了车棚啊,整体来看也不是为了做景观而做景观嘛

    2. 用户名618290

      作为一名外人,感觉原始住所灵魂被剥夺,剩下一堆建筑垃圾
      莫名没了生活气息

    3. 用户名452178

      人才是生活气息的关键,记忆是需要时间去积累的。

  6. 用户名940536

    确实不错

  7. hanxjing

    真的为使用者考虑的设计 这善意显得珍贵

  8. Dirty pink

    挺有意趣的

  9. WL…

    整的蛮好

  10. sleepbear睡睡

    规整了一下后,好多了

Featured jobs Post a jobAll jobs »