International Ideas Competition Reinventing Our Rivers

Four Rivers, Three Winners

项目标签

位置
Canada
类型
Landscape

非常感谢 Reinventing our Rivers Competition Group 予gooood分享以下内容。
Appreciation towards Reinventing our Rivers Competition Group for providing the following description.

关于该项目的竞赛征集信息可以参见gooood往期文章点此进入
More about the computation stage click here

2017年9月19日,魁北克市政府公布了“重建河流”竞赛项目的三位优胜者。魁北克市市长Régis Labeaume,和文化、历史及城市规划行政委员会副主席Julie Lemieux出席该发布会。

来自美国布鲁克林的CADASTER团队赢得了竞赛第一名,获得奖金$100,000。二等奖由挪威公司White Arkitekter team获得,奖金 $60,000,其团队成员来自欧洲 ,美国及加拿大。第三名由加利福尼亚团队JOO HYUNG OH获得,奖金$40,000。

On September 19, 2017, the City of Québec presented the three winning teams in the Reinventing Our Rivers competition. In attendance were Régis Labeaume, mayor of Québec City, and Julie Lemieux, vice chair of the executive committee responsible for culture, heritage, and urban planning.

The U.S. team CADASTER from Brooklyn took home the $100,000 first prize. The second prize of $60,000 went to the White Arkitekter team, representing Norway, with members from Europe, the U.S., and Canada. The third place prize of $40,000 went to the JOO HYUNG OH team from Glendale, California.

▼第一名,the first place

Four Rivers Three Winners

▼第二名,the second place

Four Rivers Three Winners

▼第三名,the third place

Four Rivers Three Winners

“所有参赛作品的质量都非常高,但经过委员会的评审,我们最终选出了三个最优秀的项目,”市长Régis Labeaume说道,“面对这些竞赛项目,我们感到非常激动。我们已经找到未来发展的突破口。”

“The quality of the proposals we received was very high, but the three selected by the jury stood out from the rest,” said Mayor Régis Labeaume. “We’re thrilled by the ideas they came up with, and we now have a great jumping-off point to develop our rivers in the years ahead.”

 

顶尖的评审委员会成员
A top notch jury

以荷兰建筑师Jandrik Hoesktra为代表的评委会成员包括:
Claude Cormier,景观规划师,蒙特利尔
Jérôme Dupras,生物学家、魁北克大学渥太华分校教授,加蒂诺
Ken Greenberg,城市规划师、瑞尔森大学教授,多伦多
Julie Lemieux,文化、历史及城市规划行政委员会副主席,魁北克城
Jacques Soignon,绿地及环保局主任,南斯
Annie Tardivon,景观规划师,城市规划师,终身教授,INUITS代理机构,巴黎

评委会的评审意见引发了该竞赛项目对魁北克市发展的热烈讨论。投票过程也充分考虑到该竞赛项目对河流的远期规划影响。经过激烈的讨论,评委会成员相信每一个竞赛项目都会对河流发展整体规划起到有利的影响。

“评委会成员极具专业性的知识,为此次魁北克市河流规划提出了建设性意见,”Julie Lemieux说道“我们不仅研究所有参赛作品的细枝末节,更努力寻求帮助我们未来发展的更好意见。此外,除了河流发展这一项目,我们还考虑到当前气候变化对我们的影响和挑战,因此我们决定充分尊重并回应河流的生态系统。”

An international jury, led by architect Jandrik Hoesktra from the Netherlands, was assembled to select the winners:
Claude Cormier, landscape architect, Montréal
Jérôme Dupras, ecologist and professor at Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau
Ken Greenberg, urban designer and professor at Ryerson University, Toronto
Julie Lemieux, vice chair of the executive committee responsible for culture, heritage, and urban planning, Québec City
Jacques Soignon, director of the Department of Green Spaces and the Environment, Nantes
Annie Tardivon, landscape architect, urban planner, and tenured professor, Agence INUITS, Paris

The jury’s deliberations sparked useful discussions about the impact of the competition for Québec City. The selection process also got the ball rolling on the long-term planning for the rivers. The jury members discussed the proposals and noted that each one contained ideas that could be useful in drawing up the River Development Master Plan.

“The quality of the jury and the knowledge the members brought the table fuelled some very productive discussions about Québec City’s rivers,” said Julie Lemieux. “Not only did we review each proposal in detail to select the winners, we also looked for ideas that would help us envisage the future. In addition to river development per se, we also took into account the challenges posed by current environmental requirements and by climate change so we would make choices that respect the rivers’ ecosystems.”

 

四条河,三位胜出者
Four rivers, three winners

第一名
CADASTER团队,布鲁克林,美国:
Gabriel Cuellar,城市设计(美国)
Athar Mufreh,景观、环境(美国)

The Headwater Lot方案提供了具体和实际的解决方案,该方案用简单又聪慧的方法让河流更加亲人。该设计团队用其敏锐的洞察力,让河流连接城市生活与自然环境,赢得了评委会的芳心。他们的方案思路清晰,极具说服力。且对于所有四条河流现状,乃至河流的未来发展,城市发展和居民的日常生活都带来了有利措施。

First place
The CADASTER team, Brooklyn, United States:
Gabriel Cuellar, Urban Design (U.S.)
Athar Mufreh, Landscape Architecture and Environment (U.S.)

The Headwater Lot proposal offered realistic, concrete solutions to the questions of river accessibility and use that are smart yet simple. The team’s keen understanding of the community and its environment showed in their plans for reconnecting the urban fabric with the natural environment , which won over the jury. Their proposal sent a powerful message, conveying a clear, simple development strategy that works for all four rivers and that could have a major impact on the future of the rivers, the development of the city, and the daily lives of its residents.

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners   Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners 960x1460 2

Four Rivers Three Winners 960x1455 2

Four Rivers Three Winners 960x1209 1

 

二等奖
WHITE Arkitekter,奥斯陆,挪威:
Jenny Mäki,建筑师(瑞典)
Eric Reid,景观规划师(加拿大)
Rebekah Schaberg,城市规划师,(美国)
Anna Graf,环境设计专家(瑞典)
Joan Rassmusen,建筑师(丹麦)
Sander Schuur,可持续性水管理工程(荷兰)
Niels de Bruin,景观规划师(瑞典)

评委会钟爱该方案中将城市河流转变为城市国家公园“四河公园”这个议题。他们认为这个方案既大胆又具有革新性,目的明确又极具说服力。方案总主题,用多种方式强调了城市居民享受水资源的权利,以及水域对城市生活的重要性。该方案中一系列公园规划项目将城市城市生活与自然环境,通过水系密切的连接在一起。

Second place
The WHITE Arkitekter team, Oslo, Norway:
Jenny Mäki, Architect (Sweden)
Eric Reid, Landscape Architect (Canada)
Rebekah Schaberg, Urban Planner (U.S.)
Anna Graf, Environmental Design Specialist (Sweden)
Joan Rassmusen, Architect (Denmark)
Sander Schuur, Sustainable Water Management (Netherlands)
Niels de Bruin, Landscape Architect (Sweden)

This proposal was evocatively titled Parc des quatre rivières, National Urban Park of Québec. The jury loved the idea of a national urban park. They found it bold and innovative. The intentions were clear and the proposed methods convincing. The overall theme and its multiple applications highlight the right of residents to enjoy the rivers in different ways, with the addition of many new park features to help bridge the divide between urban and natural environments and encourage residents to truly reconnect with the rivers.

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

 

三等奖
JOO HYUNG OH,格兰岱尔,美国:
Joohyung Oh,建筑师(美国)
Jae Ho Yoon,城市规划师(韩国)
Su In Kim,建筑师(韩国)
Hyuksung Kwon,景观规划师(韩国)
Sunjae Yu,城市规划师,韩国

环流,这个极具想象力的方案吸引了评审团的眼球。该方案在评审团中因其了不小的争议,一方评审员认为该方案展现了巨大想象力和前瞻性的视野,而另一方却指出了该设计的缺陷。总体上说,该方案具有非常理想化的乌托邦式视野,却很难真正实施。尽管如此,该方案给这一项目竞赛带来了不同的想法,并最终使之成为优胜者之一。

Third place
The JOO HYUNG OH team from Glendale, United States:
Joohyung Oh, Architect (Pentatonic, U.S.)
Jae Ho Yoon, Urban Designer (Pentatonic, South Korea)
Su In Kim, Architect (Pentatonic, South Korea)
Hyuksung Kwon, Landscape Designer (Pentatonic, South Korea)
Sunjae Yu, City Planner (Pentatonic, South Korea)

Called The Loop, Reinventing Our Rivers, this highly imaginative proposal grabbed the jury’s attention. The proposal generated strong reactions among the jury, with some members applauding it for its boldly imaginative scope and others underscoring certain flaws. In general, the proposal was very powerful as an idealized, utopian vision, but hard to imagine in terms of real world implementation. Nonetheless, the wealth of inspirational ideas it contained—it was an ideas competition, after all—earned this proposal a place among the winners.

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Four Rivers Three Winners

Latest jobs+ Post a jobAll jobs »

发表评论

7 评论

  1. H,

    谁知道第三名是用什么软件做到的?

  2. Vito -朱

    我也 好想 做一次 插画风啊!!!!+1

  3. 陳苦苦同學

    插画的那个看不大懂啊

    1. Tiya

      哪里不懂点哪里。来,我给你讲讲。

    2. 陳苦苦同學

      他那个loop就是创造了一条环路串联场地?其他都没咋看懂

    3. Tiya

      每个小局部是在讲述某种空间设计,能看懂,但是这些局部不索引到总图,说实话是的确很难把这些断片脑补串联起一个完整的画面。也或许他文字描述了,但是我本人的英语水平有限,看不懂,所有串联不起来。哈哈。所以总的看来,这个方案看起来吃力的原因就是【没索引】和【英语没过10级】。。。所以感觉每个局部都独立了,没融合,强硬的串了一圈。所以让人觉得没那么容易的接受。

  4. ____歪叉叉

    我也 好想 做一次 插画风啊!!!!

Featured jobs Post a jobAll jobs »