AHSA FARMSTAY by Creative Crews Ltd.

Nature, tradition, family

Project Specs

Location:

非常感谢  Creative Crews Ltd. 予gooood的分享以下内容。更多关于他们请至:Creative Crews Ltd. on gooood.
Appreciation towards Creative Crews Ltd. for providing the following description:

该项目让建筑师有机会检验建筑和当地文化之间的关系。与泰国别的偏远地区一样,传统建筑工艺存在失传的危机。

This project allowed the architect to examine Architecture as the relationship between buildings and culture. In Chiang Rai, similarly to other rural places in the country, vernacular building techniques are not passed down from generations to generations.

▼位于自然环境中的农场民宿群外观,the farmstay cluster and its natural surroundings  ©Baan lae suan

这种陌生感以及社会生态的改变,逐渐腐蚀了居民与传统建筑的关系。生活方式的改变,是传统的家住形式变得越来越无关,因此千篇一律的水泥房屋变得流行。传统住宅要么被糟糕地扩建,增加一些现代元素,要么被拆掉当作旧木收购。

▼农场民宿主体是由一座主楼、两栋客房单元楼、一个活动区组成的,the main group of the farmstay is made by host unit, gust units and activity area

This lack of familiarity coupled with the changing socio-cultural landscape has eroded the relationship between traditional buildings and the people living in them. As people livelihoods changed, traditional homes are becoming less relevant, resulting in an increasingly popular trend of replacing vernacular homes for generic concrete houses. Vernacular houses are either inadequately adapted with ‘modern extensions’ or being dismantled and sold as reclaimed timber, in parts spurred on by other poorly adapted buildings.

▼当地家住形式的农场民宿,the farmstay is full of familiarity like the local tradition home  ©Baan lae suan

▼传统风格的主楼,host unit in traditional  ©Baan lae suan

▼主楼上部外观,exterior view of host unit upper floor ©Baan lae suan

▼客房单元,guest unit  ©Thitaya Tan

▼活动区,activity area  ©Baan lae suan

AHSA农场民宿项目希望能够通过文化旅游这个方案解决以上的问题,并让传统建筑工艺能够流传更久。柯林戴维斯在《关于建筑的思考》一书 ‘造型’这一章中谈到过造型和材质之间的关系。戴维斯提出,虽然造型和材质互相交织,却又是两个完全不同的实体。在如何保留建筑这个课题里,保留造型或是保留材质是两个流行的又互相冲突的方式。其中一个一定会更占上风。

▼零散分布于周边环境中的洗手间、主厨房和用餐区,the restroom, main kitchen and dinning pavilion spread out in the surroundings

The AHSA FARMSTAY Project address this issue through the programme of cultural tourism and the conservation of vernacular architecture for future generations. In the chapter Form from Colin Davies’ Thinking About Architecture, the relationship between Form and Matter is discussed. Davies pointed out that although form and matter are closely intertwined, they are very much two distinct entities. Two prevalent ideas in conservation are the conflict between form and matter, over which should take precedence in being preserved.

▼农场田地和树木环绕的主厨房,main kitchen surrounded by the farm land and trees ©Thitaya Tan

▼主厨房,main kitchen  ©Jirakit Panomphongphaisarn

▼主厨房内部空间,interior of main kitchen  ©Baan lae suan

▼用餐区,dinning pavilion  ©Thitaya Tan

▼主楼下的厨房空间,kitchen space under the host unit  ©Thitaya Tan

▼客房单元及外部露台、廊道,the gust units and its terrace, passage  ©Baan lae suan

▼客房内部,the guest rooms  ©Baan lae suan

回收的旧实木被选为建筑的主要材料。建筑师选择保留原始建筑的精髓,而不是完全复刻。组成原本建筑的材质和构成部分作为独立个体收集起来重新组织,形成新的造型,以服务新的功能。在建造过程中, 为节约成本减少浪费,每一片旧实木都被记录在案。一些旧木留有之前的木工痕迹,形态也不同,这些都被保留。每个痕迹都讲述了该片木板的故事和旅程。建筑的部分细节采用传统建筑工艺,另外的一些为了结构的完整性进行了改良优化。

▼构造细节,construction detail

Re-claimed timber from dismantled homes was selected as the main building material. The architect chose to conserve the essence of the original buildings in parts rather than restoring as whole. The matter which made up the original buildings are preserved as individual components which are reassembled, taking on new forms to serve new functions. Extensive documentation of individual pieces was undertaken to minimize construction cost and material wastage. Some material has distinctive forms resulting from previous joinery, which are preserved and celebrated. Each mark tells the story of the journey of each piece of timber, where it has been, and how it was used. Some details were designed to mimic vernacular construction methods, others were updated and improved upon to ensure structural integrity.

▼建筑以回收旧实木为主要材料,部分细节采用传统建筑工艺,Re-claimed timber as the main material and some details is constructed by vernacular construction method  ©Thitaya Tan

▼木构造细部,timber structure detail  ©Thitaya Tan(first)©Baan lae suan(last two)

    

最终, AHSA农场民宿项目让建筑师有机会展示传统建筑也可以通过优化,适应逐渐变化的社会文化生态以及社会经济景象。

Ultimately, the AHSA FARMSTAY project allowed the architect to demonstrate that vernacular architecture could be updated and made relevant to the shifting socio-cultural as well as socio-economic scene of present times.

▼场地平面,site plan

▼构造细节剖面,section detail

项目名称: AHSA农场民宿
建筑事务所:Creative Crews Ltd.
事务所网站:http://creative-crews.com/
项目位置: 清莱府,泰国
项目年份: 2017 至今
建筑面积: 565平方米。
摄影:Thitaya Tan
其他合作者:Thitaya Tan
业主: Rung Rak Chan Co., Ltd
结构工程师:WOR CONSULTANT
机电工程师:EXM CONSULTANT CO., LTD
工匠团队: Bundanjai
项目预算:940万泰铢
品牌/产品
1. 当地供应商: 门五金/家具
2. LAMPTAN: LED 灯
3. PATHAM: 预制水泥屋瓦
Project name: AHSA FARMSTAY
Architect’ Firm: Creative Crews Ltd.
Website: http://creative-crews.com/
Contact e-mail: pr@creative-crews.com
Project location: Maechan, Chiang Rai
Completion Year: 2018
Gross Built Area: 565 sqm.
Photo credits: Thitaya Tan
Other participants
Client: Rung Rak Chan Co., Ltd
Craftsman Team: Bundanjai
Brands / Products
1. HAFELE: Door Hinges / Furniture Fitting
2. LAMPTAN: LED Super Slim
3. PATHAM: Cement Roof Tile

More: Creative Crews Ltd.   更多关于:Creative Crews Ltd. on gooood.

Post a Comment